3RD TIME_7MAR16_THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY_DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE -2

     
                                 SINCE March 3, 2016

IN RE :

A.C. NUMBER  10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

DISBARMENT CASE

DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 9

(FAKE REDUNDANCY)

TRANSLATED

4.1.9 NINTH DECEITFUL ACT

         

         BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ :

(Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.1 & 3.1.2.2)

   

         The Company while it is true that they closed

         

          an old plant,  PROCESS-2,  but on the other hand, 

          they opened a new plant, which I called 

          BITUMEN PLANT, and which they called 

  

          BITUMEN IMPORT FACILITY.