}

BACK TO SYLLABUS

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

ATTY. THEODORE TE_10FEB16_ E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE PHILIPPINES SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE PHILIPPINES SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM




FIGURE  1 
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM
MANAGEMENT DIRECTORY





FIGURE  2
BUENSUCESO SSS RECORD INQUIRY





FIGURE  3
SIBUCAO SSS RECORD INQUIRY RESPONSE

The following Justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines are DEEMED provided with copy of this   "E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE PHILIPPINES SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM"  through Atty. Theodore Te's PIO e-mail address on  February 10, 2016 to the present and prayers for corrective administrative and/or judicial and/or disciplinary actions be instituted in due time.


IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/



MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/

IMAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/



MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/


MAGE CREDIT:http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/




COMPLAINT REMINDER_10FEB16_REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED


ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT
SINCE MARCH 24, 2015



The following Justices of
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED 
provided with copy of
 this "REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED 
BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW 
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED"  
through Atty. Theodore 
Te's PIO e-mail 
address on March 24, 2015 
to the present and prayers 
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative 
and/or judicial and/or 
disciplinary actions 
be instituted in due time. 


ATTY. THEODORE TE_10FEB16_CONTINUING PERSUASIVE APPEALS AND REMINDERS FILED

CONTINUING
PERSUASIVE APPEALS
AND REMINDERS FILED
(10 COUNTS)

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

COUNT 10
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 7january2016)
ATTY. THEODORE TE : "SHELL CATARACT"
image credit: screenshot_you tube.com

ATTY THEODORE TE_10FEB16_9TH COUNT _PERSUASIVE APPEAL_MALFEASANCE AND MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE



EXTENDED  CALL FOR REFORM 

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT


image credit:morguefile.com

READ MORE

ATTY THEODORE TE:_10FEB16_PERSUASIVE REMINDER_8TH COUNT_ PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE U.S.A.

8TH COUNT PERSUASIVE APPEAL

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
EXTENDED  CALL FOR REFORM 
A FRIENDLY NOTICE IN A SERIES OF 15 NOTICES FROM DECEMBER 14, 2015 TO JANUARY 11, 2016 WHICH MIGHT BE EXTENDED IF REFORMS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED ACCORDING TO THE VISION OF THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE PURPOSELY TO HELP HER IN HER ADVOCACY IN THE PROMOTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG HER OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.   
image credit:morguefile.com 

An office or a Public Information Office is not a person.
Using "Public Information Office" to sign e-mail responses betray the advocacy of Chief Justice Sereno in promoting the constitutional concept of accountability.   


SUPREME COURT_10FEB16 _66th FOLLOW UP_E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION


E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY
SUPREME COURT_10FEB16
PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT


66th 

Follow up e-mail
for personnel name and position
since November 2, 2015


ATTENTION : PIO CHIEF
Atty. Theodore Te


LAPITAN_10FEB16_44th FOLLOW UP OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT


COUNT 44
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

ATTY. WILFREDO V. LAPITAN
THIRD DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

GEUS_10FEB16_43RD FOLLOW UP _REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY

COUNT 43

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT










;