Monday, February 22, 2016
4TH TIME_ 22FEB16_THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY_DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 1
THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY
SINCE FEBRUARY 17, 2016
IN RE :
A.C. NUMBER 10084
ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
DISBARMENT CASE
DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12
(in view of the requirements of the business)
TRANSLATED
4.1.12 DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12
BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ:
IT IS NOT TRUE THAT "REDUNDANCY"
EXISTS WHEN I WAS REMOVED FROM
EMPLOYMENT AS ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
ASSERTED AND PROMOTED.
4th TIME_19 FEB16_IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS
IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS
SINCE FEBRUARY 17, 2016
IN RE : A.C. NUMBER 10084
DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12 BY ATTY. QUIROZ
DEFENSE COUNSELS MALICIOUS REMOVAL OF THE PHRASE "IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS" FROM THE DOCUMENT THEY CITED.
 |
| Atty. Emiterio C. Manibog |
 |
| Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid |
These defense counsels are from
ACCRALAW.
BETTER BE THIS MONKEY THAN SOME LAWYERS
THIS MONKEY FEELS SHAME SOME LAWYERS DO NOT
COMPLAINT REMINDER_22FEB16_REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
SINCE MARCH 24, 2015
The following Justices of
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED
provided with copy of
this "REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED
BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED"
through Atty. Theodore
Te's PIO e-mail
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED
provided with copy of
this "REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED
BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED"
through Atty. Theodore
Te's PIO e-mail
address on March 24, 2015
to the present and prayers
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative
and/or judicial and/or
disciplinary actions
to the present and prayers
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative
and/or judicial and/or
disciplinary actions
be instituted in due time.
ATTY. THEODORE TE_22FEB16_CONTINUING PERSUASIVE APPEALS AND REMINDERS FILED
COUNT 12
Thursday, February 18, 2016
TWELFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_
SERENO LECTURES ARTXI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION
ATTY. THEODORE TE AND
ATTY. WILFREDO LAPITAN :
ARE YOU NOT PUBLIC OFFICERS?
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.
click on this image to view the message
12TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_2ND TIME_SERENO LECTURES ARTXI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION
COUNT 12
ATTY. THEODORE TE AND
ATTY. THEODORE TE AND
ATTY. WILFREDO LAPITAN :
ARE YOU NOT PUBLIC OFFICERS?
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.
click on this image to view the message
SINCE FEBRUARY 18, 2016
ATTY THEODORE TE_9TH COUNT _PERSUASIVE APPEAL_MALFEASANCE AND MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE
EXTENDED CALL FOR REFORM
SINCE DECEMBER 16, 2005
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
ATTY. THEODORE TE_22FEB16_ E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE PHILIPPINE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM
A
COUNT 11
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
ATTY. THEODORE TE_10FEB16_
E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM
THE PHILIPPINES
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
ATTY THEODORE TE:_22FEB16_PERSUASIVE REMINDER_8TH COUNT_ PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE U.S.A.
8TH COUNT PERSUASIVE APPEAL
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
EXTENDED CALL FOR REFORM
A FRIENDLY NOTICE IN A SERIES OF 15 NOTICES FROM DECEMBER 14, 2015 TO JANUARY 11, 2016 WHICH MIGHT BE EXTENDED IF REFORMS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED ACCORDING TO THE VISION OF THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE PURPOSELY TO HELP HER IN HER ADVOCACY IN THE PROMOTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG HER OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.
image credit:morguefile.com
An office or a Public Information Office is not a person.
Using "Public Information Office" to sign e-mail responses betray the advocacy of Chief Justice Sereno in promoting the constitutional concept of accountability.
SUPREME COURT_22FEB16 _74th FOLLOW UP_E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION
E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY
SUPREME COURT_22FEB16
SUPREME COURT_22FEB16
PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
74th
Follow up e-mail
for personnel name and position
since November 2, 2015
ATTENTION : PIO CHIEF
Atty. Theodore Te
LAPITAN_22FEB16_52nd FOLLOW UP OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
COUNT 52
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
ATTY. WILFREDO V. LAPITAN
THIRD DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
GEUS_22FEB16_51ST FOLLOW UP _REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY
COUNT 51
since December 4, 2015
ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
