7TH TIME_14MAR16_BITUMEN PLANT_ATTY. QUIROZ'S DECEITFUL INTENT TO CHEAT

                                      

 SINCE March 4, 2016

IN RE :

A.C. NUMBER  10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

DISBARMENT CASE

DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 10

                                                (DECEITFUL INTENT TO CHEAT) 


TRANSLATION

4.1.10  TENTH DECEITFUL ACT

            BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ : 




            (Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.1 & 3.1.2.2)

         

            The intention to cheat is the motivation

            

            behind when Atty. Raul Quiroz referred

            to the BITUMEN IMPORT FACILITY as

            a " commercial business unit"  and

            not a "refinery business unit" in order

            to justify hiring other people to operate 

            the BITUMEN IMPORT FACILITY.

     

8TH TIME_ 14MAR16_THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY_DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 2

     
                                 SINCE March 3, 2016

IN RE :

A.C. NUMBER  10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

DISBARMENT CASE

DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 9

(FAKE REDUNDANCY)

TRANSLATED

4.1.9 NINTH DECEITFUL ACT

         

         BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ :

(Contrary to 3.1.1 & 3.1.2.1 & 3.1.2.2)

   

         The Company while it is true that they closed

         

          an old plant,  PROCESS-2,  but on the other hand, 

          they opened a new plant, which I called 

          BITUMEN PLANT, and which they called 

  

          BITUMEN IMPORT FACILITY.

     

18TH TIME_ 14MAR16_THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY_DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 1

THERE WAS NO REDUNDANCY

SINCE FEBRUARY 17, 2016

IN RE :

A.C. NUMBER  10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

DISBARMENT CASE

DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12

(in view of the requirements of the business)

TRANSLATED 



4.1.12 DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12 
          
           BY ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ:


           IT IS NOT TRUE THAT "REDUNDANCY"
           EXISTS WHEN I WAS REMOVED FROM 
           EMPLOYMENT AS ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ
           ASSERTED AND PROMOTED.

       

           (Contrary to  3.1.1  &  3.1.2.2  &  3.1.2.2 )

18th TIME_14MAR16_IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS

IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS

SINCE FEBRUARY 17, 2016

IN RE : A.C. NUMBER 10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT CASE
DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 12 BY ATTY. QUIROZ

DEFENSE COUNSELS MALICIOUS REMOVAL OF THE PHRASE "IN VIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS" FROM THE DOCUMENT THEY CITED.

Atty. Emiterio C. Manibog

Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid

                                          

                                       These defense counsels are from 

 ACCRALAW.

BETTER BE THIS MONKEY THAN SOME LAWYERS

THIS MONKEY FEELS SHAME SOME LAWYERS DO NOT

4TH TIME_ 14MAR16_RANKING WAS RIGGED_CIRCUMSTANTIAL DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

PERFORMANCE RELATED BONUS
payment document 

SINCE March 9, 2016

IN RE :

A.C. NUMBER  10084

ATTY. RAUL QUIROZ 

DISBARMENT CASE

DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 6

      (circumstantial documentary 

   evidence proving ranking was rigged) 

4.1.6   DECEITFUL ACT NUMBER 6

           BY ATTY.  RAUL QUIROZ: 

             (Contrary to  3.1.1  &  3.1.2.2  &  3.1.2.2 )

           PRB  (Performance Related Bonus) 

           PAYMENT which BUENSUCESO 
  
           RECEIVED served as additional

           EVIDENCE OF RIGGED "RATING"          

            [page 1    2]  WHICH ATTY. RAUL

           QUIROZ PROMOTED.

20TH TIME_14MAR16_RANKING WAS RIGGED _IN RE A.C. NUMBER 10084_ATTY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT CASE

20TH TIME_14MAR16_

RANKING WAS RIGGED _

IN RE A.C. NUMBER 10084_

ATTY RAUL QUIROZ DISBARMENT CASE

SINCE FEBRUARY 15, 2016

COMPLAINT REMINDER_14MAR16_REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

SINCE MARCH 24, 2015

The following Justices of
the Supreme Court of the
Philippines are DEEMED 
provided with copy of
 this "REPUBLIC ACT 7641 CIRCUMVENTED 
BY SHELL, PROMOTER GUARDIANS OF LAW 
SHOULD BE DISCIPLINED"  
through Atty. Theodore 
Te's PIO e-mail 

address on March 24, 2015 
to the present and prayers 
for corrective and/or
and/or investigative
and/or administrative 
and/or judicial and/or 
disciplinary actions 

be instituted in due time. 

READ MORE

ATTY. THEODORE TE_14MAR16_CONTINUING PERSUASIVE APPEALS AND REMINDERS FILED

COUNT 12

Thursday, February 18, 2016

TWELFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_

SERENO LECTURES ARTXI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION

ATTY. THEODORE TE AND 

ATTY.  WILFREDO LAPITAN : 

ARE YOU NOT PUBLIC OFFICERS?
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.

click on this image to view the message

12TH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_16TH TIME_14MAR16_SERENO LECTURES ARTXI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION

COUNT 12

Thursday, February 18, 2016

TWELFTH PERSUASIVE APPEAL_

SERENO LECTURES ARTXI SECTION 1 OF THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION

ATTY. THEODORE TE AND 

ATTY.  WILFREDO LAPITAN : 

ARE YOU NOT PUBLIC OFFICERS?
THEN, LISTEN TO THE WORDS
OF CHIEF JUSTICE SERENO.

click on this image to view the message

ATTY. THEODORE TE_14MAR16_ E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE PHILIPPINE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

COUNT 11

Wednesday, February 10, 2016 

ATTY. THEODORE TE_10FEB16_ 

E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM 

THE PHILIPPINES 

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

READ MORE

ATTY THEODORE TE_14MAR16_9TH COUNT _PERSUASIVE APPEAL_MALFEASANCE AND MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE

EXTENDED  CALL FOR REFORM 
SINCE DECEMBER 16, 2005

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

image credit:morguefile.com

READ MORE

ATTY THEODORE TE:_14MAR16_PERSUASIVE REMINDER_8TH COUNT_ PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE U.S.A.

8TH COUNT PERSUASIVE APPEAL

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT

EXTENDED  CALL FOR REFORM 

A FRIENDLY NOTICE IN A SERIES OF 15 NOTICES FROM DECEMBER 14, 2015 TO JANUARY 11, 2016 WHICH MIGHT BE EXTENDED IF REFORMS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED ACCORDING TO THE VISION OF THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE PURPOSELY TO HELP HER IN HER ADVOCACY IN THE PROMOTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG HER OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.   

image credit:morguefile.com 

An office or a Public Information Office is not a person.

Using "Public Information Office" to sign e-mail responses betray the advocacy of Chief Justice Sereno in promoting the constitutional concept of accountability.   

READ MORE

SUPREME COURT_14MAR16 _88th FOLLOW UP_E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION

E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY
SUPREME COURT_14MAR16

PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT


88th 

Follow up e-mail

for personnel name and position

since November 2, 2015

READ MORE

ATTENTION : PIO CHIEF

Atty. Theodore Te

LAPITAN_14MAR16_66th FOLLOW UP_ OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

COUNT 66

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

READ MORE

ATTY. WILFREDO V. LAPITAN

THIRD DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

GEUS_14MAR16_65th FOLLOW UP _REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY

COUNT 65

since December 4, 2015

ESTABLISHING GUILT WITH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE  DOUBT

OIL DEREGULATION LAW_REALITY AND FALSITY