}

BACK TO SYLLABUS

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

ATTY. THEODORE TE_updated 16DEC15_PERSUASIVE APPEALS AND REMINDERS FILED


PERSUASIVE APPEALS
AND REMINDERS FILED
(9 COUNTS)

COUNT 9
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 16december2015)
ATTY. THEODORE TE : MALFEASANCE AND
MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE
image credit: morguefile.com

COUNT 8
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 14december2015)
ATTY. THEODORE TE : PEOPLE IN
GOVERNMENT E-MAIL RESPONSE
MODEL FROM THE U.S.A.


COUNT 7
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 2december2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Legality of the constitution prevails 
over rule on procedure.
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF



COUNT 6
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 1december2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Save the Chief Justice from shame
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF



COUNT 5
(persuasive appeal/reminder on 30November2015)
CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Stop thinking in silos
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF



COUNT 4_1
(persuasive appeal /reminder  on  27November 2015_1)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

ON THIS DATE YOU MAY HAVE 
BEEN  CRIMINALLY LIABLE  VIA
 THE PROVISION OF THE
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
Section 3. Corrupt practices of public officers. In addition to acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by existing law, the following shall constitute corrupt practices of any public officer and are hereby declared to be unlawful:
(e) Causing any undue injury to any party (myself, Antonio L. Buensuceso Jr.) including the Government, or giving any private party (PSPC, SHELL) any unwarranted benefits, (NON-PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY) advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative (ATTY. THEODORE TE, functions) or judicial functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and employees of offices (Atty. Theodore Te, an officer of one offices of the Supreme Court, the PIO) or government corporations charged with the grant of licenses or permits or other concessions.



COUNT 4_2
(persuasive appeal /reminder on  27November 2015_2)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

ON THIS DATE YOU MAY HAVE 
BEEN  CRIMINALLY LIABLE  VIA
PROVISION ON 
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829 PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS


MALACAÑANG
M a n i l a
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1829
PENALIZING OBSTRUCTION OF APPREHENSION AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS

WHEREAS, crime and violence continue to proliferate despite the sustained vigorous efforts of the government to effectively contain them;

WHEREAS, to discourage public indifference or apathy towards the apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders, it is necessary to penalize acts which obstruct or frustrate or tend to obstruct or frustrate the successful apprehension and prosecution of criminal offenders;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, FERDINAND, E. MARCOS, President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by law do hereby decree and order the following:

Section 1. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period, or a fine ranging from 1,000 to 6,000 pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon any person who knowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays the apprehension of suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases by committing any of the following acts:

(e) delaying the prosecution of criminal cases by obstructing the service of process or court orders or disturbing proceedings in the fiscal's offices, in Tanodbayan, or in the courts;





COUNT 4_3
(persuasive appeal /reminder  on  27November 2015_3)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

THE RETIREMENT PAY LAW WHICH HAVE
BEEN CIRCUMVENTED  OR VIOLATED BY
PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION et al.

UNLAWFUL

REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7641
December 9, 1992

RETIREMENT PAY LAW

AN ACT AMENDING ARTICLE 287 OF PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 442, AS AMENDED, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE LABOR CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES, BY PROVIDING FOR RETIREMENT PAY TO QUALIFIED PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY RETIREMENT PLAN IN THE ESTABLISHMENT

Section 1.    Article 287 of Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended, otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines, is hereby amended to read as follows:
    "Art. 287.    Retirement. - Any employee may be retired upon reaching the retirement age established in the collective bargaining agreement or other applicable employment contract.   "In case of retirement, the employee shall be entitled to receive such retirement benefits as he may have earned under existing laws and any collective bargaining agreement and other agreements: Provided, however, That an employee's retirement benefits under any collective bargaining and other agreements shall not be less than those provided herein.   "In the absence of a retirement plan or agreement providing for retirement benefits of employees in the establishment, an employee upon reaching the age of sixty (60) years or more, but not beyond sixty-five (65) years which is hereby declared the compulsory retirement age, who has served at least five (5) years in the said establishment, may retire and shall be entitled to retirement pay equivalent to at least one-half (1/2) month salary for every year of service, a fraction of at least six (6) months being considered as one whole year.   "Unless the parties provide for broader inclusions, the term one-half (1/2) month salary shall mean fifteen (15) days plus one-twelfth (1/12) of the 13th month pay and the cash equivalent of not more than five (5) days of service incentive leaves.   "Retail, service and agricultural establishments or operations employing not more than (10) employees or workers are exempted from the coverage of this provision.   "Violation of this provision is hereby declared unlawful and subject to the penal provisions provided under Article 288 of this Code."
Sec. 2.    Nothing in this Act shall deprive any employee of benefits to which he may be entitled under existing laws or company policies or practices.

Sec. 3.    This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its complete publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation, whichever comes earlier.

Approved:   December 9, 1992




COUNT 4_4
(persuasive appeal /reminder on  27November 2015_4)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

YOUR FAILURE TO RESPOND IS 
FROM THIS DATE  MAY OR SHALL CONSTITUTE VIOLATION OF 
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6713 RULE 6

RESPONSE TO REQUESTS AND PETITIONS MANDATED BY THE Rules Implementing the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (Republic Act No. 6713)


(Republic Act No. 6713) RULE 6 _Duties of public officials and employees

Section 3. In case of written requests, petitions or motions, sent by means of letters, telegrams, or the like, the official or employee in charge shall act on the same within fifteen (15) working days from receipt thereof, provided that:

(a) If the communication is within the jurisdiction of the office or agency, the official or employee must:

(1) Write a note or letter of acknowledgement where the matter is merely routinary or the action desired may be acted upon in the ordinary course of business of the department, office or agency, specifying the date when the matter will be disposed of and the name of the official or employee in charge thereof.



COUNT 3
(persuasive appeal /reminder  on  26November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

CHIEF JUSTICE PERSUASIVE VIDEO
Call on cooperation and self-reformation

On this video 
the Honorable Chief Justice
 is offering you,  
Atty. Theodore Te,  the carrot. 
The stick shall be following next.



COUNT 2
(persuasive appeal /reminder on  24November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF
click on the image of Ka Pepe Diokno to read article 
posted by Atty.Theodore  Te about having been inspired by Ka Pepe.

PIO CHIEF Atty. Theodore Te : Thank you for being inspired by Ka Pepe Diokno, and with all due respect please walk the talk and walk tall.         



COUNT 1
(persuasive appeal /reminder on  11November 2015)
ATTENTION:PIO CHIEF

Please be guided by this 
2014 Christmas message 
from Hon. Ma. Lourdes Sereno



ATTY THEODORE TE_23DEC15_9TH COUNT _PERSUASIVE APPEAL_MALFEASANCE AND MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE

image credit:morguefile.com



ATTY THEODORE TE:8th reminder_ PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT E-MAIL RESPONSE MODEL FROM THE U.S.A.


8TH COUNT PERSUASIVE APPEAL
FOR  ATTY. THEODORE TE
A FRIENDLY NOTICE IN A SERIES OF 15 NOTICES FROM DECEMBER 14, 2015 TO JANUARY 11, 2016 WHICH MIGHT BE EXTENDED IF REFORMS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED ACCORDING TO THE VISION OF THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE PURPOSELY TO HELP HER IN HER ADVOCACY IN THE PROMOTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT OF ACCOUNTABILITY AMONG HER OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.  




image credit:morguefile.com

An office or a Public Information Office is not a person. Using "Public Information Office" to sign e-mail responses betray the advocacy of Chief Justice Sereno in promoting the constitutional concept of accountability.   

E-MAIL LETTER TO ATTY. THEODORE TE




MODEL E-MAIL RESPONSE FROM SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN. NOTE THAT SHE SIGNED THIS E-MAIL RESPONSE TO ME WITH HER NAME AND POSITION AND NOT JUST "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SENATE".   



RULE 6 SECTION 3 OF THE RULES IMPLEMENTING THE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES (RA 6713)  

SUPREME COURT_23DEC15 _36TH FOLLOW UP_E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION




E-MAIL ADDRESS INQUIRY
SUPREME COURT_23DEC15
PERSONNEL NAME AND POSITION

36th Follow up e-mail
for personnel name and position
since November 2, 2015

ATTENTION : PIO CHIEF
Atty. Theodore Te



for Atty. Theodore Te
(9 COUNTS)



LETTER OF INQUIRY







COUNT 1
(persuasive appeal /reminder on  11November 2015)
Please be guided by this 
2014 Christmas message 
from Hon. Ma. Lourdes Sereno




LAPITAN_23DEC15_14th FOLLOW UP OBJECTION ON THE MATTER OF SENDING NOTICE BY THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT






ATTY. WILFREDO V. LAPITAN
THIRD DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT










EXHIBIT A 
NOTICE  DATED APRIL 7, 2014
SENT TO MY ADDRESS IN THE PHILIPPINES WITH BAD INTENT  
THAT I MAY NOT BE ABLE TO READ THIS AND FAIL TO MAKE 
AN APPEAL ON TIME.  
AN OBVIOUS CHICANERY,  THE CULPRIT MUST BE ADMONISHED.



EXHIBIT  1
   RED RIBBON AUTHENTICATION
ANTONIO L. BUENSUCESO JR.
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS

THIS DOCUMENT SHOWS  THAT
BUENSUCESO IS IN THE U.S.A.
AND NOT IN THE PHILIPPINES
HENCE COMMUNICATIONS DOCUMENTS
SHOULD BE SENT TO MY REGISTERED ADDRESS
HERE IN THE U.S.A.




 EXHIBIT 2
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS
 FROM PAGE 32 DISBARMENT COMPLAINT
12901 Francine Terrace
Poway, CA 92064


EXHIBIT 3
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS
FROM  FROM Atty. Oliveros  dated  13 June 2013
my address here in the U.S.




COPY RECIPIENTS

Copies  for Atty. Raul Quiroz and his counsels  was sent through his counsels'  

Atty.Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.
 and
Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid  and
ACCRA LAW Head Office
 e-mail addresses and copies

  for PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS and Mr. Eduard Geus was sent  through    

Mr. Eduard  Geus e-mail 



 for the Third Division Deputy Clerk of Court, Wilfredo V. Lapitan  
AND
for Honorable Chief Justice 
Ma. Lourdes Sereno

is coursed through 

Atty. Theodore Te, PIO Chief, Supreme Court of the Philippines
on
December 3, 2015






GEUS_23DEC15_13th FOLLOW UP REITERATION OF DEMAND PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT PAY










EXHIBIT  1



EXHIBIT 2




EXHIBIT 3





EXHIBIT 4

EXCERPTED FROM 
NUMBERS 21,  22,  23,  24,  25,  26







EXHIBIT 5



EXHIBIT 6

photos of the defense lawyers and particulars





COPY RECIPIENTS

Copies  for Atty. Raul Quiroz and his counsels  was sent through his counsels'  

Atty.Emiterio C. Manibog Jr.
 and
Atty. Joy Anne C. Leong-Pambid  and
ACCRA LAW Head Office
 e-mail addresses and copies

  for PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS and Mr. Eduard Geus was sent  through    

Mr. Eduard  Geus e-mail 



 for the Third Division Deputy Clerk of Court, Wilfredo V. Lapitan  
AND
for Honorable Chief Justice 
Ma. Lourdes Sereno

is coursed through 

Atty. Theodore Te, PIO Chief, Supreme Court of the Philippines
on
December 4, 2015






;